De redactie van NRC selecteert de beste artikelen uit The Economist voor een breder perspectief op internationale politiek en economie.
Neither party has much tolerance for wily pragmatists like Thom Tillis.
Dit artikel komt uit The Economist
What is it about Thom Tillis of North Carolina that has turned him into a rare Republican legislator willing to defy President Donald Trump, and, maybe even more rare, a United States senator having some fun doing his job?
You might say he has courage, and there would be truth to that. Mr Tillis likes to note he grew up in a trailer park, and he learned to enjoy „a good scrap”. He is in a scrap with Mr Trump again now, blocking his nominee to run the Federal Reserve, Kevin Warsh, until the Department of Justice drops a spurious criminal investigation into the incumbent, Jerome Powell.
You might argue that Mr Tillis has principles, and you would have a point there, too. His many years as a management consultant before entering politics helped make him „a process guy”, as he calls himself. He is vigilant about the Senate’s institutional role, including as a check on the executive branch when it abuses its power by, say, trying to bully the Fed into cutting interest rates.
But courage and conviction alone are not satisfying explanations for Mr Tillis’s displays of independence. They do not account for the retreats and reversals he has made over the years, or for his continuing reluctance, to the great irritation of the left, to criticise Mr Trump. Even as he condemned the „bogus investigation” into Mr Powell during Mr Warsh’s confirmation hearing on April 21st, Mr Tillis blamed the probe on low-level aides, studiously ignoring Mr Trump’s advocacy of it. He also floated the idea of a congressional investigation of cost overruns in the renovation of the Fed’s headquarters, the flimsy predicate for Mr Trump’s vendetta. Mr Tillis is clearly trying to clear space for the president to climb down, with some dignity, from a perilous perch.
Rigid moral terms are poorly suited to describe the manoeuvres required to succeed in public life. The better explanation for Mr Tillis’s independent views is that he plays smart politics, but is trying to do so in an era when both parties insist instead on a stupid game, one that delights their activists but dismays everyone else. In fact, a perverse moral code devised by intensifying partisanship is the problem for politicians like Mr Tillis. It turns them into outcasts by rendering bipartisanship as betrayal, pragmatism as opportunism and compromise as a dirty word, rather than a necessary and even noble act. And so, term by term, Congress becomes less able to make law, and less relevant.
Mr Tillis had a meteoric rise in politics, one that supplemented his background in systems management with legislative expertise. He became speaker of the North Carolina General Assembly after just two terms, after engineering a Republican majority in 2010. He is still trying, as he puts it, „to make the Republican Party better and more electable”. Under President Trump he sees Republicans instead making the same mistake he thinks Democrats made under President Barack Obama. „They get drunk with an election,” he says, in a recent interview in his Senate office. „They overreach. They forget that in North Carolina, 40% of our electorate is unaffiliated, and when you start acting crazy or you overreach, they generally don’t show up to re-elect you.”
Mr Tillis is not impressed with the observation that he seems liberated since announcing, after a collision with Mr Trump last year, that he would not run for a third term. „No shit, Sherlock,” he says, rolling his eyes. „I don’t have to go through a cost-benefit analysis any more, right?” Before, if he disagreed with the White House, he would worry about how to speak up but „not alienate my base, not alienate my donors and not alienate the president, right? All three of those factors are irrelevant now.” But, he quickly adds, it also „chaps my ass” to hear suggestions he did not act independently before. Mr Tillis calls himself a „pro-life, pro-Second-Amendment, pro-limited-government conservative”, but he worked with Democrats when they were in the majority to promote gun safety and protect same-sex and interracial marriages, among other matters.
De redactie van NRC selecteert de beste artikelen uit The Economist voor een breder perspectief op internationale politiek en economie.
For such heresies, his state party censured him in 2023. But weathering the tantrums of activists is a basic requirement for political success in a purple state like North Carolina, where Democrats and Republicans are roughly in balance. The obstacle Mr Tillis decided he could not overcome was a demand from Mr Trump last summer to support his „One Big Beautiful Bill Act”. Mr Tillis concluded the bill’s cuts to Medicaid would be „devastating” to North Carolina. After he voted no, Mr Trump accused him of grandstanding and said he would recruit a primary challenger. The next day, Mr Tillis announced he would not run again. He still marvels at the folly: the bill was going to pass even without his vote. He faced a tough campaign, but his party has worse odds of holding the seat without him.
Mr Tillis believes politicians need to „make practical decisions”. He has no yearning to wind up a hero to the Democratic Party but a pariah in his own, as Republicans like Liz Cheney have for battling Mr Trump. „You know what all martyrs have in common?” he asks, not pausing for the guess. „They’re dead.” He takes little comfort from Democratic plaudits. He prefers to note that Democrats have hounded their own heretical, deal-making senators, such as Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, both of whom opted not to stand for re-election after opposing some of President Joe Biden’s policies.
Bipartisan acts may earn some praise in the moment, he says, but both parties punish them when primary season rolls around. He fears that, in the Senate, it is becoming „almost a death warrant” to demonstrate independence. The problem for any party hoping to build a durable majority is that, like North Carolina, America is a purple place.
© 2026 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved.